![]() And if you too are interested, I will return to this. I still keep in my mind the idea of navigation. Yes, I understand the desire to see this functionality in the Asset, but it will complicate the understanding of the template itself and potential scalability. It allows you easily parse Asset and bring it to any necessary campaign setting (instead of castles and units introduce planets and ships (Galcon), military bases and other units add any functionality and behavior of units to large objects, areas, each other). Also code has mark of colliding 2 units: you can handle/collide it and make a 'local battle', or let them passing through each other). ![]() In the code, for example, have the appropriate point(marks) in unit and castle collidings, when castle != unit target. But the decision was made to move away from a particular design (Asset represents just drag & drop system selection and interaction template, without reference to any content or campaign setting. I had some thoughts about it at the stage of development Asset: the design level might include rivers, bridges, roads, and, accordingly, units would use the navigation. Waiting impatient to update because I really like the idea of the levels that will be generated automatically. I do not know is simply an idea that occurred to me. So pudiesen exist an enemy and someone who can ally themselves or enemiustarse depending on the conditions. One thing that if I would like to propose for future updates, is the idea of whether could there be an AI that was both the Player and the Enemy as possible enemy. Is just an idea that I think interesting the compatibility with an asset like that. Also you can create so even any small interaction between them by the road. Using a navigation system for the troops so not is overlapping them ones with the others. ![]() Perhaps it can be an idea for future updates. I am just using the PolyNav asset to try to create features of navigation and works nice. Kudos to you on being able to handle over 100 machines on your own, I know a lot of orgs that would just turn to an MSP at some point to handle day to day it needs.Good Asset! I am ending another project and until the weekend not I could dedicate him a little of time. You get access to all of the tools they use for your own investigations, but you don’t even need to use them after you get the agent installed on all your machines. I know they just published some for the kaseya attacks, but I’m sure they have some about hafnium. On CrowdStrike’s website they publish readings on how they protected their customers against zero day attacks. You probably realize that security should be a top of mind concern, but that you can’t meet the security demand on your own and also still manage the help desk, imaging new hires machines, ensure the network is operating as expected, etc etc etc.Įssentially, for less than half the cost of hiring a full time security analyst, you get access to a 24/7 threat hunting team and a 24/7 remediation team. I can’t comment from a customers perspective, but Falcon Complete is perfect for this kind of environment. Thank you all for any experience you can share! I am also curious if you are on Falcon Complete if you still have a separate incident response retainer (whether with CS or another party) and if you make use of other managed security services like managed-SOC or SIEM (I'm just trying to figure out where the Falcon Complete fits in our security stack, if it pretty much covers our bases or if we still need to look for other services). ![]() I'm especially curious what other platforms you may have looked at before and what pushed you towards CS. I was hoping to get feedback from others who are using the platform and get your thoughts on it. To that end I was looking at Falcon Complete. Particularly to help remediate incidents and also help tell us in the event of a breach, how far the attack extended and what was actually done (for example, any data exfiltrated?). One-man IT shop with about 135 Windows endpoints across 4 offices who is a little overwhelmed when it comes to security and looking for some help.Īfter the Hafnium attack (we still have on-prem Exchange, although thankfully it was not breached), I started thinking about where we come up short in our security posture.Īs I am a one-man shop and readily admit I am not a security expert, I was looking for managed services to help with this. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |